The only platform that starts with the PE stamp and works backwards. Score AI tools against 7 liability layers. Know which tools you can deploy — and under what conditions — without increasing your professional liability exposure.
Reviewed by practising PE · PhD · IWE · Multi-AI verified methodology
Get a FitScore for any AI tool against your firm's digital maturity profile and your specific project context. Know your liability exposure before you deploy.
Start free assessment →Get your AI tool assessed against the 7-layer AEC compliance framework. Published scores give procurement teams the evidence they need to approve your tool.
Request scoring →The problem
No PE stamp disclaimer. No code edition validation. No human review gate. No insurance coverage data. If something goes wrong on a stamped deliverable — who is liable?
70% of AI tools in AEC have no PE disclaimer
Vendor documentation rarely addresses professional liability or responsible charge requirements.
CMMC enforcement begins October 31, 2026
Federal AEC contractors cannot bid on new DoD contracts without verified compliant AI tools.
Procurement decisions are based on vendor claims
No independent, AEC-specific compliance verification tool existed — until now.
Assess your firm (10 min)
Complete the Digital Maturity Assessment across 7 dimensions — BIM readiness, AI governance, ISO 19650 stage, supply chain alignment, and PE oversight protocols.
Set up your project
Define project type, phase, jurisdiction, and delivery method. The AHJ code edition lookup runs automatically across 51 jurisdictions. Hard compliance filters run before any score is shown.
Get your FitScore
Every AI tool is ranked against your firm profile and project context. Tools that fail your jurisdiction or insurance threshold are blocked before scoring. Remaining tools ranked 0–10.
The ACS scoring framework covers every liability surface that matters in AEC professional practice.
PE Responsible Charge
AI Governance
Code Edition Control
BIM & ISO 19650
Cybersecurity
Worker Safety
Vendor Transparency
Plus: Liability Transfer Test (Q21b) · Open-Source Track · Funding Transparency Score
The questions AEC practitioners actually face — answered.
“Our AI tools need to pass CMMC by October 2026. Where do we stand?”
Platform 1 scores every tool in your stack against CMMC 2.0, SOC 2 Type II, and NIST AI RMF. Hard filters block tools with insufficient E&O coverage before FitScore is calculated.
L5 Cybersecurity · Hard Filter Pipeline
“We're a European AI vendor. Which US states can we sell into today?”
The ACS licensure registry maps your current certifications against 51 US jurisdictions. Gaps to CMMC, SOC 2, and state AI legislation are surfaced with a prioritised remediation roadmap.
US Market Readiness · ACS Registry
“We used AI to assist structural calculations. Can we stamp them?”
The Stamp-Safe classification specifically answers this. It checks PE disclaimer disclosure, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and the vendor's PE stamp compatibility declaration.
L1 PE Responsible Charge · Q21b · Stamp-Safe
Tool scores are never influenced by vendor relationships or payments. Every score is evidence-based research from public sources.
All scoring formulas reviewed by a practising structural engineer with PhD, PE, PMP, and IWE credentials. Engineering rigour, not marketing claims.
Architecture reviewed independently by Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini. Changes adopted only on 3-of-4 consensus.
Start free. Upgrade when decisions start carrying risk.
$0
$99/month
or $84/mo billed annually
$49/month
Price locked — never increases
Limited — first 100 only
Claim founding rateFirm Standard ($499/mo) includes 5 seats, full compliance scoring, portfolio tracking, and salary benchmarking for your full team.
Vendor assessment is separate from subscription pricing. One-time fee per tool.
$1,600
one-time
$4,500+
one-time
US Market Entry Pack ($3,500–$6,000) available for international vendors mapping existing certifications to US requirements. Contact us to discuss.